Mandate
Buying or selling one asset, case by case
A service apart from the subscription, assessed one by one. Most of the time the answer is that the subscription is enough.
- 01
A case that gets turned down
Terminal Cuenca del Plata, in Montevideo, has its concession extended to 2081. There is no open process and no recent comparable to argue a price against, so a mandate on that asset would be charging for waiting. That gets said up front and nothing is charged.
- 02
What it asks of the client
The asset, the perimeter and what has already been decided. Without those there is no mandate: there is a question, and a question is not billed as a mandate.
- 03
What it delivers
A document with the register read against that transaction: the comparables of your case, who bought them, what they were cleared to do and on what conditions, with the file number of each one.
- 04
When it is declined
When the asset sits outside the five markets, when what is asked for is a signed valuation — which is not done here — or when the client's calendar requires people this company does not have.
- 05
What it does not include
No representation, no negotiation, and no introductions to third parties.
A mandate is put in writing. If it is taken, what is delivered is a document: no calls, no meetings and no committed deadline for anything.
Subscription
Your comparable is already written. The question is who reads it first.
The complete edition arrives now, at no charge and with no automatic subscription. If the Southern Cone is not your market, you will see that there; and if it is, you will have the date, the file number and the figure before your counterparty does. And if you subscribe afterwards and it is not for you, you have 30 days: one click and the whole payment comes back, with nobody asking you anything.